Critics of live animal testing say the practice is cruel and unnecessaryinstead, researchers can use alternatives like computer modeling to conduct their research researchers say animal testing. Cruelty to animals in laboratories you can't choose when and what you eat, how you will spend your time, whether or not you will have a partner and children, or who that partner will be you can't even decide when the lights go on and off. Animal testing is inhumane the humane society international has discovered that animals used in experimentation are subject to force feedings, food and water deprivation, physical restraint, and forced inhalation. Chemical, pharmaceutical, and medical research laboratories use live animals to test everything from shampoo to surgical procedures there are more than 115 million dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, and other mammals that suffer and die each year, but 80 percent of the lab animals used - mice, rats and birds - are not protected by the animal welfare act, and therefore are not. While most researchers who support animal testing seem to feel this is a regrettable but necessary practice, some, such as dr john vandeberg, director of the texas biomedical research institute.
Thus, con wins this ultimately by shifting to 'not all animal testing are inhumane, therefore it shouldn't be banned' 3 points to con side note: bettabreeder, try not to deal with absolutes, as it is incredibly hard to upheld a 100% substantiating case. However, there should be other means of research because the whole process of animal research remains cruel and inhumane animal rights activists have gathered a large amount of information that has closed down many laboratories that violate anti-cruelty statutes. What should be the criteria for when, how and on what animals testing is done — do you believe that animal testing is responsible for lifesaving medicines and treatments, and that it is the best way to determine if products are safe. Proponents of animal testing claim that experimental procedures are designed to cause animals as little harm and suffering as possible however, testing procedures performed on animals are often cruel and inhumane and have the potential to cause considerable distress, both physically and psychologically.
I believe animal testing should be stopped its not only cruel but also inhumane in my opinion how can we as humans take away the life of innocent animals for out own benefit, there are other ways to get tests done. Animal rights groups have invested considerable energy, significant resources, and sustained commitment to advancing an agenda to serve their goal of eliminating all animal research the recent events surrounding chimpanzee research reflect just a small portion of this agenda. No but it should be because testing on any animal is physical abuse the animal has no choice in it and that should be illegal i have seen awful pictures of chimps with li pstick, elephants. Animal testing is making use of animals in experiments carried out for the betterment of human lives there are many arguments regarding the pros and cons of animal testing it helps save human.
Animal testing should be banned - animal testing for human safety is inhumane and must be banned beloved house pets such as rodents, rabbits and even dogs are being tested on all over the world. Thesis: animal testing should be banned from the united states because it is cruel and inhumane, because it yields results that are inconclusive and unreliable, and because there are other, more efficient and cost-effective methods available. Best answer: it's cruel, inhumane and animals feel pain i think testing should be done on lifetime criminals in prisons let them finally give something back to society that way.
Animal testing is inhumane category education show more show less what is animal testing what does animal testing mean animal testing meaning & explanation - duration: 3:58. Reasons why animal testing should be illegal animal testing is cruel and inhumane some of the animals die or suffer from neck breaking, decapitation, or carbon dioxide asphyxiation. List of cons of animal experimentation 1 cruel and inhumane treatment protocols in animal testing are often painful to the test subjects they are forced fed, deprived of food and water, restrained physically for prolonged periods, inflicted with burns, wounds and pain to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even killed through neck-breaking or asphyxiation.
While animal testing may be effective and serve its purpose of keeping people safe for the most part, it is still inhumane alternative solutions may have restrictions, but there are not more. Those against the use of animal testing claim that it is inhumane to use animals in experiments i disagree completely it would be much more inhumane to test new drugs on children or adults. Animal testing is cruel and an inhumane way to torture animal for mankind's own benefit there have been millions of animal that have suffered a vicious, painful.
Unfortunately, even as they discuss the reasons animal models are so unreliable, the authors ultimately conclude that animal testing is still necessary — a claim some authorities disagree with strangely, the article concludes that we should adjust how animals are used in research, as opposed to looking for alternatives. Seventy-eight percent agreed that the development of alternatives to animal testing for cosmetics testing is important sixty-one percent of respondents said that cosmetics and personal care product companies should not be allowed to test products on animals. Animal testing is an issue that must be addressed because it is an inhumane practice being avoided by the government this experimentation consists of scientific tests in which a live animal is forced to undertake tests that will cause them pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm. Animal testing isn't just cruel, it's also bad science cruelty free international argues animal testing is both an inhumane and ineffective practice, and it is high time we stop testing on other living creatures.
5 unnecessary animal experiments still happening now wrote a compelling piece in 2005 on why animal research is unnecessary and inhumane but animal testing is not required. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel and inhumane yes, we should continue animal testing animal testing has contributed to many life saving cures and treatments animals are good test subjects because they are similar to humans in many ways helps ensure the safety of products computer models don't always work during certain test. A speech on animal testing i have always felt strongly about animal rights, and cruelty to animals, so i decided to do my speech on something less talked about and often avoided, which is animal vivisection- in other words, animal testing. Testing on animals is common practice for products such as cosmetics or drugs some people regard testing on animals as completely wrong and inhumane and they believe is should not be allowed.